Digital Edition

Nov.24, 2014

Issue link:

Contents of this Issue


Page 45 of 47

LAND LINES 46 THE JOURNAL OF COMMERCE NOVEMBER 24.2014 Lawrence Gross INTERMODAL AT A CROSSROADS W I T H I N T E R M O D A L L O A D I N G S in record territory and railroads pushed to the limit to move the vol- ume, it might seem a bit strange to be sounding an alarm about a slow- down. But the intermodal industry is entering a period of vulnerability after a prolonged period of growth. While trouble isn't inev itable, intermodal's near-term destiny has passed to forces outside of intermo- dal's control. This hasn't been the case previ- ously. Intermodal's historical gains have been hard-won. The industry has put together a sufficiently fine service that the intermodal equation — a reasonable degree of reliability coupled with cost savings — has resonated with more and more shippers. Now, the prolonged ser - vice meltdown that shows no real sign of improvement threatens that equation. As of the end of October, the objective data, in the form of average intermodal train speeds published by the railroads, was telling a sad story. Average intermodal train speed over the previous four weeks stood at just 28.4 mph, down 2.7 mph, or 8.7 percent, from a year earlier. This is the lowest level during the current crisis, lower even than during the depths of last winter's polar vortex. This is important not because of the speed itself, but because this statistic also serves as a barometer of congestion and service variability. Nevertheless, intermodal vol- ume has held up well, to put it mildly. Over the same four-week period, intermodal volume tracked by the Association of American Railroads was up a solid 5.3 percent year-over- year and stood just below the record, set a month earlier. But it would be a mistake to assume that such contin- ued growth is inevitable, regardless of service quality or price. Simply put, intermodal has grown through the service cri- sis because highway capacity has remained tight. This has led ship- pers to make use of the intermodal alternative. Shippers have become convinced that the truck driver crisis is here and relief may be a long way off, so they're reluctant to release any current avenue to freight capacity. But from here, intermodal will keep growing only as long as tight highway capacity continues. Work by FTR Transportation Intelligence indicates that truck- ing demand is running at more than 98 percent of capacity. Further, we expect this situation will persist for at least the next 12 to 18 months. But a sce - nario just as easily could be painted for improvement. For example, what if the newly elected Republican Congress pushes through a rollback of hours-of-service regulations, and thereby gives 3 or 4 percent capacity improvement back to the industry? Immediate crisis ended! Further, FTR's expectation for truck capacity to go critical some- time in 2016 is based on our best guess for the timing of proposed additional reg ulations such as electronic on-board recorders and speed limiters. With an acting head of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration and a change in con- trol in the Senate, will that timetable hold? At current intermodal service levels, if trucking capacity begins to loosen up, then domestic intermo- dal growth will stop. Furthermore, it's not out of the question that traf- fic will begin to convert back to highway. FTR's most recent estimate for intermodal market share sounds a cautionary note. After rising a sharp 1.4 percent during the first half of the year — to 18.9 percent of long- haul dry van traffic — intermodal's share plunged back to 17.9 percent in the third quarter. Setting aside the recently volatile international sec- tor, the portion of intermodal share accounted for by the movement of domestic equipment also plunged in the third quarter. So, despite recent growth in intermodal activity, there are signs that the service situation is starting to bite. As another potentially frigid winter awaits, I'll be listening for railroads to release concrete plans for getting the service situation under control in the near term, and changes in the normal way of doing business in the longer term, so as to prevent another meltdown the next time it snows in Chicago. Intermodal's bright future has been put at risk by the current ser- vice problems. In the near term, intermodal's destiny depends on what happens to the truck capac - ity situation. In the long term, it depends on whether the industry can regain shippers' trust as a con- sistent and reliable transportation option. JOC Lawrence Gross is president of Gross Transportation Consulting in Mahwah, New Jersey, and a partner at FTR Transportation Intelligence. A veteran with 34 years in the transportation business, he covers freight transportation, concentrating on the intermodal and trucking sectors from a transportation and equipment perspective. He is a frequent speaker at industry events. Contact him at and follow him on Twitter: @intermodalist. Intermodal has grown through the service crisis because highway capacity has remained tight.

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Digital Edition - Nov.24, 2014